sallamno complain from hip .. just fr. .... the question is how to fix ?rgdsFrom: Waleed Hammadalsalm alekum dear dr ----is pt complain from his hip ??or only its # femur which can be fixedDr Waleed
minmally invasive long LC-DCP
even putting in a retrograde nail would be a problem in this case,
unless the table is "broken" at the knee and the knee kept in flexion
while operating.
a minimally invasive plate would be the simplest solution for him,
especially if it is a locking plate, which can be slid in from above,
and the screws passed percutaneously
Mangal Parihar
Myles Clough wrote:
> The other reason to do it retrograde is (as Rajesh mentioned) it
> might be difficult to align the proximal fragment with the distal one
> because the hip doesn't move. 3 reasons for persisting with antegrade, none of
> which have overwhelming strength
: "HESHAM EL-MOWAFY" <heshammowafy@hotmail.com>
> bi lateral cemented bi polar and long plate if he is 48 y or more
> or repositinal ostiotomy and repositional ostiotomy plade plate 120 d- 110 d
> with long plate
>
> Dr HESHAM EL-MOWAFY. Prof. Ortho.
DEAR DR ----
ALSALAM ALIKOM WARAHMAT ALLA WABARACATO
about this case their is fracture neck of femur also
so broad DCP plat is very good with contouring the
plate over the proximal femur to insert at least 2
canscellus screws in the neck and dont fotget bone
graft around comminuted fracture
Mahmoud Yasser
Alex students university hospital
Rajesh
Mr.K.R.Rajesh,MS,DNB,FRCS,FRCS(Orth)
Consultant Upper Limb Surgeon,
Division of Upper Limb & Joint Replacement Surgery.
Cosmopolitan Hospital,
Trivandrum,Kerala,
India.
Mobile-9447191205
Hello Mangal,
Monday, May 15, 2006, 10:49:22 AM, you wrote:
MP> even putting in a retrograde nail would be a problem in this case,
MP> unless the table is "broken" at the knee and the knee kept in flexion
That is why we use only distractor+flat radiolucent table, never
traction table.
--
Best regards,
Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Research Institute
of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
Hello Myles,
Saturday, May 13, 2006, 11:45:30 PM, you wrote:
> What would be your reasons for favoring the retrograde approach in this
> case?
In our settinfs any problem preventing smooth antegrade nailing is
indication to retrograde.
> and which would you actually do, assuming you can line up the fracture
> when you get the patient on the table?
I would apply a small wire distractor, and check whether any adducton
can be added. If yes - any antegrade nail, better with lateralized
proximal end, may be used. Either with transverse or neck screws. If no
adduction - though the proximal fragment is short but it is enough to
place two AP screws.
--
Best regards,
Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Research Institute
of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
The other reason to do it retrograde is (as Rajesh mentioned) it might be
difficult to align the proximal fragment with the distal one because the hip
doesn't move. 3 reasons for persisting with antegrade, none of which have
overwhelming strength
1. Not everyone is happy with retrograde technique. This might not be the
first case to do the retrograde approach on.
2. You would need a very long nail to get two locking screws into the
proximal fragment. I would insist on a CT scan if I were going to do a
retrograde nail to make sure there was no proximal extension of the
diaphyseal fracture, as well as checking the neck as I mentioned before.
3. The fracture is above the isthmus so you are not going to get good
intramedullary contact on both sides of the fracture. This means that only
the proximal locking screws are holding the reduction proximally. Other
things being equal I prefer an antegrade nail for more proximal shaft
fractures.
What would be your reasons for favoring the retrograde approach in this
case? and which would you actually do, assuming you can line up the fracture
when you get the patient on the table?
Myles Clough mylesclough@shaw.ca
Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon (Retired), Kamloops, BC, Canada
Clinical Instructor, University of British Columbia
Editor, OWL (Orthopaedic Web Links)
http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com
Orthogate Workshop Pages
http://www.orthogate.com/clough/index.htm
> Hello Myles,
>
> Saturday, May 13, 2006, 5:45:44 AM, you wrote:
>
> > Then I would do a locked IM nail, probably antegrade as long as the
>
> Why not use retrograde nails which would allow to ignore any problem
> with the proximal femur.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexander N. Chelnokov
Prof. DR. Bahaa Ali Kornah
Prof. of Orthopaedic Surgery
Al-Azhar university . Cairo Egypt